Davos 2016 | NSA Spying: Privacy & Secrecy Debate Explained [video]

NSA Spying

NSA Spying

This video report is a comprehensive analysis of the debate on NSA spying; privacy & secrecy debate presented at the 2016 Davos Economic summit in Switzerland in January 2016. In this report I will highlight the points and counterpoints of the arguments regarding the premise of mass surveillance in line with countering terrorism and the hidden agenda of cataloging the general populace.

Additional Research:

Privacy & Secrecy In A Digital Age

GeoINT:  Creating a Global C2 System

GeoINT | 2015 Final Report

2017 Budget Explained | Federalized Police Force & Totalitarian Rule

1033 Program & XO 13684


NSA President’s Request Invests in Department of Justice Criminal Justice Priorities, Including National 
Security, Cyber Security, Smart on Crime, Building Community Trust, Among Other Priority Initiatives.
The request represents a comprehensive investment in the Justice 
mission and includes increases in funding for countering violent extremism and other national 
security areas, civil rights and advancing equality under the law, Smart on Crime activities, including 
increased funds for prisoner reentry initiatives and other key enforcement initiatives, NSA

All law will become federal NSA with no distinction or sovereign 
indoctrination of states rights. This will allow for a federal policing authority as well as federal justice priorities and mandates. 
“Violent Extremism” is not defined, therefore open to interpretation down the road.  Same goes for those 
areas to be deemed ‘national security’.  There will be no civil rights, only those rights granted to you 
by the state as long as you don’t act, speak or protest against it.  Smart on crime is a deceptive way 
of saying AI driven systems will identify, target and eliminate those the state determines to be 
subversives. Billions more dollars to coerce states to forgo their rights in favor of federal agendas.

 This represents a further selloff of your personal rights, property rights, freedom and liberty our forefathers fought and died 
for.   It is not the Justice Department’s duty to ‘keep us safe’.  Their responsibility is limited to presiding over  cases brought before it as to the rule of law.  



From Privacy Product Reviews
A   Level9News Subscription  is required for viewing and submitting comments on this post
Login Here